Appeal No. 1996-2822
Application 08/153,916
image movement vector representing movement of an object
within an image represented by the image signal based on both
the image signal and the vibration vector" as recited in
Appellant's claim 1. In fact, we note that Kondo fails to
teach "[a]n image movement vector detection apparatus for
detecting an image movement vector from an image signal
produced by a video camera, the image movement vector
representing movement of an object within an image represented
by the image signal" as claimed in
Appellant's claim 1. Upon our review of Kondo, we find that
Kondo is concerned with determining a vibration of the camera.
In column 5, lines 7 through 45, Kondo discloses a vibration
isolation apparatus for preventing a frame vibration of an
image signal. In particular, the output terminal 22 outputs a
signal representing an image vibration movement amount. We
note that Kondo is not concerned with detecting the movement
of an object within an image.
10
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007