THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte AJAY K. GARG
______________
Appeal No. 1996-2857
Application 08/191,7371
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before METZ, WARREN and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 5 through 8 and 15, and refusing to allow claims 9 through 13 as amended subsequent to the
final rejection, which are all of the claims in the application.2
We have carefully considered the record before us, and based thereon, find that we cannot
1Application for patent filed February 4, 1994. According to appellant, this application is a
continuation of application 07/831,588, filed February 5, 1992, now abandoned.
2See amendment of February 4, 1994 (Paper No. 15); amendment of June 15, 1994 (Paper No.
17); and amendment of December 2, 1994 (Paper No. 19).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007