THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JAY M. WARDLE
__________
Appeal No. 1996-2986
Application 08/348,6251
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-11 and 21-29. Claims 12-20 have been canceled.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus
1Application for patent filed December 2, 1994.
According to the appellant, the application is a division of
Application 08/013,882, February 5, 1993, now U.S. Patent No.
5,399,976, issued March 21, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007