THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte KENNETH R. GREULICH and THOMAS M. BROAD
________________
Appeal No. 96-3093
Application 08/046,8801
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 23
through 29 and 41 through 49, all the other claims having been
1Application for patent filed April 14, 1993. According
to appellants, the application is a division of Application
07/569,128, now U.S. Patent No. 5,241,464, issued August 31,
1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007