THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KARL S. BOOS, ANDREAS WALFORT
FRIEDHELM EISENBEISS and DIETER LUBDA
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3141
Application No. 08/415,7661
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 1 through 5
and 17 through 21. Claims 6 through 16, the only other claims remaining in the application,
stand withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner as being directed to a non-
elected invention.
1Application for patent filed April 3, 1995. According to appellants, the application is a
continuation of Application 08/111,963, filed August 26, 1993, now abandoned; which is a continuation of
Application 07/943,793, filed September 11, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007