Appeal No. 96-3158
Application 08/065,857
(German Offenlegungsschrift)2
Claims 1, 4 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Husby in view of Bell and Spies ‘730.
Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Husby in view of Bell.
Claims 1, 4 and 8 stand additionally rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Husby in view of
Bell, Spies ‘730 and Cornellier.
Claim 9 stands additionally rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Husby in view of Bell and
Cornellier.
Reference is made to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 26,
mailed October 27, 1995) and supplemental examiner’s answer
(Paper No. 30, mailed March 26, 1996) for the examiner's
2Our understanding of this foreign language document is based upon a translation
prepared by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of that translation
accompanies this decision.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007