THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PAUL H. HAMISCH JR.,
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3198
Application No. 08/371,6421
____________
HEARD: November 15, 1999
____________
Before PAK, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 1, 2 and 5-12. Claims 13 and 4, which are all
of the remaining claims pending in this application, have been
1Application for patent filed January 12, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007