THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EAMONN HOBBS and WILLIAM APPLING
____________
Appeal No. 96-3203
Application No. 08/081,9841
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Adminstrative Judge, STAAB, and
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 21 through 31, 33 and 34 under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b). The only other claims still pending in the
1Application for patent filed June 23, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 08/004,635 filed January 12, 1993, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/846,142 filed March
5, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007