Ex parte GIBSON et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No.1996-3237                                                         
          Application 08/266,431                                                      


          predetermined ones of the plurality of data signals, the                    
          number of scannable registers being responsive to a first test              
          signal to sample first and second states of the predetermined               
          ones of the plurality of data signals at first and second                   
          periods of time, respectively, and to a second test signal to               
          form at least one serial shift register to shift out the                    
          sampled first and second states; and                                        
                    means for comparing the first and second states to                
          one another to issue an indication of error when a mis-compare              
          is not detected.                                                            

          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Carbine                     5,253,255           Oct. 12, 1993               
          Claims 6-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                        
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Carbine taken                   
          alone.                                                                      
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for                 
          the respective details thereof.                                             
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the                      
          evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support              
          for the rejection.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into              
          consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants’                    

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007