THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TIMOTHY J. RUSS, KHAL M. KHATIB
and JAY O. BAKER
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3332
Application 08/321,0251
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, COHEN
and McQUADE Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 10 and 22 through 25. These claims constitute all of
the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed October 6, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007