THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN J. SAYOVITZ, ANGELA R. MAYFIELD
and ERNEST P. SEDLOCK JR.
____________
Appeal No. 96-3352
Application No. 08/129,9211
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 11, 13-17, 23-27 and 32-37 which are all of the
claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed September 30, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007