Ex parte JUNIMAN - Page 1




                                              THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                             

                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                           
                     journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                            

                                                                                                                                 Paper No. 39                                          

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                              
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                                      Ex parte DAVID JUNIMAN                                                                                           
                                                                               _____________                                                                                           

                                                                            Appeal No. 96-3446                                                                                         
                                                                         Application 08/327,1471                                                                                       
                                                                              ______________                                                                                           

                                                                           HEARD: May 5, 1999                                                                                          
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                     Before CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge, and McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent                                                                         
                     Judge and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                    


                                                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                            

                                This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 8, all the claims in the application.                                                        

                                The claims on appeal are drawn to a stocking (claims 1, 3 and 6), dancing tights (claims 2, 4                                                          

                     and 7), and a method of using a stocking (claims 5 and 8).  Claim 6 is illustrative,  and reads:                                                                  



                                1Application for patent filed October 21, 1994.  According to appellant, this application is a                                                         
                     continuation of Application 08/106,807, filed August 16, 1993, which is a continuation of Application                                                             
                     07/891,039, filed June 1, 1992.                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007