Appeal No. 96-3561
Application No. 08/045,241
displayed needs to be changed. Hayden has no such teaching or
suggestion of this specifically claimed limitation.
Accordingly, we will not sustain the rejection of claim 7
under 35 U.S.C. 103.
Claim 11 also recites a memory means having a “character
code memory region and an external character memory region,
for memorizing a graphic data relating to said specific
function in said external character memory region.” While the
examiner points to a “key means” and a “control means” in
Hayden, with regard to claim 11 [answer-page 3], the examiner
never comes to grips with the specific structure of the
memory, as claimed, noting only, with regard to previous
claims, that it would have been “obvious to have memory means
and external memory means to store graph data and character
data, so as to provide more information...”
While claim 11 appears similar to claim 14, the rejection
of which we have sustained, the language of claim 11 ties
together the character code memory region and the external
character memory region by reciting that the memory means is
“for memorizing a graphic data relating to said specific
function [selected by the key means] in said external
11
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007