Appeal No. 1996-3600
Application 08/284,371
rejection of these claims or of any of the claims which depend
therefrom. With respect to the rejection of claims 140, 141,
174 and 175 using the additional teachings of Young, since
Young does not cure the deficiencies in the combination of
Beyers and Welles, the rejection of these claims is also not
sustained.
In summary, the evidence presented by the examiner
does not support the rejection of claims 106-127, 133-162 and
168-175 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Therefore, the decision of the
examiner rejecting these claims is reversed.
REVERSED
Jerry Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Parshotam S. Lall ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Joseph L. Dixon )
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007