Ex parte YESKEL - Page 1




                                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                                      

                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                      
                      journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                                         Paper No. 17                                              

                                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                                        
                                                                                     _____________                                                                                                 

                                                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                                      
                                                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                                     
                                                                                     _____________                                                                                                 

                                                                            Ex parte  FILIP J. YESKEL                                                                                              
                                                                                    _____________                                                                                                  

                                                                                 Appeal No. 96-3635                                                                                                
                                                                              Application 08/209,0961                                                                                              
                                                                                    ______________                                                                                                 

                                                                                        ON BRIEF                                                                                                   
                                                                                   _______________                                                                                                 

                      Before URYNOWICZ, JERRY SMITH and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                  

                      URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                                      


                                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                                    


                                  This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 9 and 13-15, all the claims pending in                                                                

                      the application.                                                                                                                                                             

                                  The invention pertains to a document image processing method.  Claim 1 is illustrative and                                                                       



                                  1Application for patent filed March 10, 1994.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                1                                                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007