THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MATHEW P. TUTTLE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3647
Application No. 08/065,7201
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 8, 10 through 14 and 17 through 20. In an Amendment
After Final (paper number 10), claims 2 through 5, 14 and 18
were canceled, and claim 11 was amended. After submission of
the brief, the examiner indicated that claims 8 and 10 are
1Application for patent filed May 21, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007