THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LESLIE E. SEIBERT and PRASHANT CHAWLA
____________
Appeal No. 96-3720
Application No. 08/230,8251
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS, and SPIEGEL, Administrative
Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 5-12 and from the refusal of the examiner to allow
1Application for patent filed April 21, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007