Ex parte YAPEL et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3741                                                          
          Application No. 08/177,288                                                  

          appellants have indicated that they are not appealing the                   
          rejections of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10 and 11.  As a result,                
          we dismiss the appeal as to these claims thereby leaving for                
          our consideration on this appeal claims 3, 6, 7, 9 and 12                   
          through 20.  The only other claims in the application, which                
          are claims 21 through 24, stand withdrawn from further                      
          consideration by the examiner.                                              
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a coater                       
          apparatus enclosure.  This appealed subject matter is                       
          adequately illustrated by dismissed independent claim 1 and                 
          appealed claims 3 and 6 which depend therefrom.  A copy of                  
          these claims is set forth below:                                            
               1. A coater apparatus enclosure for enclosing the entire               
          coating applicator portion of a coating apparatus comprising:               
               an enclosure; and                                                      
               means for continuously supplying solvent-saturated gas to              
          the enclosure to prevent premature drying of coating fluid.                 
               3. The coater apparatus enclosure of claim 1 further                   
          comprising means for controlling gas flow to the enclosure.                 
               6. The coater apparatus enclosure of claim 1 wherein the               
          solvent-saturated gas includes a solvent which is a cosolvent               
          mixture in equilibrium with the coating fluid.                              
               The following references are relied upon by the examiner               
          in the rejections before us:                                                
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007