Appeal No. 96-3762
Application No. 08/245,179
claimed representation of the data in the storing means.
However, Loopik's knowledge base is not part of the data base
(see Figure 5). Accordingly, implementing the teachings of
Highland results in the knowledge base, but not the data in
the data base, being represented by relationships between
semantic entities associated with each instruction and between
semantic entities and processor resources. Further, the
examiner has not provided any other explanation as to why it
would have been obvious to make the data in the data base be
represented by the claimed relationships. Thus, the examiner
has not met all of the elements of the claims, and
consequently has failed to establish a prima facie case of
obviousness. Therefore, the rejection cannot be sustained.
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007