THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS MUNZMAY, WALTER MECKEL, ULRICH LIMAN,
HARTMUT NEFZGER, WERNER RASSHOFER, KARL-HEINZ DORNER
and ANDREAS RUCKES
____________
Appeal No. 96-3862
Application No. 08/189,8611
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WEIFFENBACH, WALTZ and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-6. The rejection of claim 6 was
withdrawn by the examiner and that claim was indicated as
1Application for patent filed February 1, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007