Ex parte HUBER - Page 11




          Appeal No. 96-3896                                                           
          Application No. 08/152,315                                                   



          (Fed. Cir. 1986).  Nevertheless, the combination does not                    
          result in the claimed invention.  Hepner does not disclose                   
          means for coupling a group of optical signals ë  to a second                 
                                                          k                            
          circulator port as recited in claim 6 and it has not been                    
          established why it would have been obvious to one of ordinary                
          skill in the art to modify the combined teachings of the prior               
          art so as to utilize such a group of signals for the single                  
          wavelength signal applied to the second circulator port of                   
          Hepner.                                                                      
                    Claim 8 requires no more than two optical signals                  
          and thus, does not distinguish over the combination of Hepner                
          and Glomb.  The two signals of claim 8 are met by the two                    
          signals having wavelengths ë  and ë  applied at circulator port1      2                                         
          1 in Figure 4 of Hepner in the demultiplexing of the two                     
          signals disclosed at column 4, line 58 through column 5, line                
          6.                                                                           







                    11                                                                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007