Ex parte BONET et al. - Page 3




            Appeal No. 96-3902                                                                                
            Application 08/442,742                                                                            


            signal processing system, such as the handset of a cordless phone.   In the mixed signal          
            processing system, plural stable power voltages are required for the reliable and efficient       
            operation of the handset to extend the operational duration of the rechargeable battery           
            power source and for proper, efficient operation of the CMOS circuitry.  The system uses a        
            stable, precise reference voltage to maintain the system voltages for the digital and analog      
            subsystems in the system as the battery power source varies in voltage over time.  The            
            system uses plural voltage regulators to maintain the system voltages.                            
                   The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the            
            appealed claims are:                                                                              
                   Gabara                    5,043,605                 Aug. 27, 1991                          
                                                          (Filed : Jun. 26, 1989)                             
                   Shibasaki                 2 078 021                 Dec. 23, 1981)                         
                   (UK Patent Application)                                                                    
                   Claims 1-5, and 7-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph for lack        
            of enablement.  Claims 1-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as              
            not particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter                          




            which applicant regards as the invention.  Claims 1-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
            § 102 as being unpatentable over Gabara.  Claims 1-4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §             


                                                      3                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007