Ex parte WOZNIAK et al. - Page 8




                Appeal No. 96-3935                                                                                                        
                Application 08/209,673                                                                                                    


                configuration by steps such as those recited in appellants’ claim 40, whereby the plug is locked in the                   

                second configuration and upon exposure to a solvent of the polymer will revert back to the prior first                    

                configuration.  Thus, since this critical physical/structural characteristic of the claimed subject matter is             

                not taught or suggested by the references relied upon by the examiner or inherent therein, we are                         

                compelled to reverse the examiner’s rejection of claims 8 through 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                               



                        Independent claim 49 has also been rejected by the examiner under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                        

                unpatentable over Popular Science Dec. 1989 or July 1989 in view of Wozniak. On page 4 of their                           

                brief, appellants have argued that                                                                                        

                       claim 49 is allowable in accordance with the decision and rationale of the Board of                               
                        Patent Appeals and Interferences opinion (Appeal No. 94-0253; see pages 4-6)                                      
                        mailed January 13, 1994. (Brief, page 4)                                                                          


                        Since claim 49 was not part of the claims on appeal in the prior decision referred to by                          

                appellants, we are at a complete loss to understand this argument.  In that regard, we also observe                       









                that pages 4-6 of the decision in Appeal No. 94-0235 addressed a rejection made by the examiner                           

                                                                    8                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007