Ex parte DEBARTOLO et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1996-3947                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/151,741                                                  


               second coupling means, coupled to said base and said                   
          second cover, for coupling said second cover to said base                   
          between a first position covering one of said longitudinally                
          extending sections and a second position exposing the one of                
          said longitudinally extending sections concealable by said                  
          second cover, said second coupling means including a hinge                  
          coupled to said second cover and said base for pivotally                    
          coupling said second cover relative to said base.                           


               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Sprenger                      4,530,865                Jul. 23,             
          1985                                                                        
          Corsi et al. (Corsi)          4,942,271                Jul. 17,             
          1990                                                                        
          Whitney                       5,336,849                Aug.  9,             
          1994                                                                        
                                                  (Filed Jan. 17, 1992)               
          Switzerland Patent            443,432                  Feb. 15.             
          1968                                                                        
          Mayer et al. (Mayer)                                                        
          German Patent                 2,124,163                Nov. 23,             
          1972                                                                        
          Pollak                                                                      

               Claims 2 through 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103.                
          As evidence of obviousness, the examiner cites Corsi in view of             
          Whitney and Pollak with regard to claims 2 through 5, 11 and                
          14, adding Sprenger to this combination with regard to claims               
          6, 7, 10 and 15 through 22, further adding Mayer to the                     
          extended combination with regard to claims 8, 9 and 23.  In                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007