Appeal No. 1996-3975
Application No. 08/328,179
Based upon the above considerations, even if the examiner
was correct in combining Mori and Goffinet in the manner
supra, the structure created would, in any event fall short of
the invention defined by the claimed subject matter, as the
aforesaid claimed subject matter requires features that cannot
be achieved by combining Mori and Goffinet. See Uniroyal Inc.
v Rudkin-WileyCorp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1051, 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1439
(Fed. Cir.), cert denied, 488 U.S. 825 (1988).
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007