THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EDWARD D. MANN
____________
Appeal No. 96-3978
Application No. 08/092,6281
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 21-26, all of the claims pending in the present
1Application for patent filed July 15, 1993. According
to appellant this application is a continuation of 07/786,327,
filed October 31, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,261,073, issued
November 9, 1993, which is a division of Application No.
07/348,318, filed May 5, 1989, now U.S. Patent No. 5,307,469,
issued April 26, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007