Ex parte MISHIO et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 96-3997                                                          
          Application No. 08/173,953                                                  


          factual basis of the rejection before us.  In re Warner, 379                
          F.2d 1011, 1017, 154 USPQ 173, 178 (CCPA 1967), cert. denied,               
          389 U.S. 1057 (1968), rehearing denied, 390 U.S. 1000 (1968).               
          Since we are of the view that the prior art applied by the                  
          Examiner does not support the rejection, we do not sustain the              
          rejection of independent claims 6, 8, and 9.                                
               With respect to dependent claim 5, the Examiner adds                   
          Chruma to the combination of Kokai 60-239376 and Kokai 56-                  
          36171 solely to meet the “silicon nitride” insulating layer                 
          limitation.  Chruma, however, does not overcome the innate                  
          deficiencies of the combination of the Kokai references and,                
          therefore, we do not sustain the rejection of claim 5 under 35              
          U.S.C. § 103.                                                               














                                          10                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007