Ex parte SHIM - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1996-4065                                                        
          Application No. 08/234,115                                                  


                         Regarding the limitation of determining                      
               whether the activated key is a plural function key,                    
               Enomoto is suggestive of this feature (in addition                     
               to the other references).  See Figure 4, item 104,                     
               where the activated key is checked and set to the                      
               proper response command.  Further, Lee teaches that                    
               at least one control command is assigned to a given                    
               key, thereby implying that some keys may have a                        
               single command function transmitted in response to                     
               their respective activation in addition to some keys                   
               causing the transmission of two, or more, commands                     
               when depressed.  (Answer-pages 9 and 10.)                              
                    Reviewing the Examiner’s citations supra, we see no               
          “determining if the actuated key is a plural function key” as               
          claimed.  Figure 4, item 104, of Enomoto “sets the key data to              
          the proper response command”, column 7, line 14.  And, the                  
          “implication” in Lee that some keys have a single command and               
          some keys have two or more commands, does not teach the                     
          “determining” step.                                                         




                    Therefore, as to the rejection of claims 5 through 8              
          using the Lee and Enomoto combination, we find they lack the                
          required limitations of claim 5, and we will not sustain this               
          rejection.                                                                  



                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007