THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte AKIRA YOSHINO
____________
Appeal No. 1996-4067
Application No. 08/227,6861
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 7 and 8.
Claim 7 is representative and is reproduced below:
1Application for patent filed April 14, 1994. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/852,217, filed May 28, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007