Ex parte BAYRAKTAROGLU - Page 3




               Appeal No. 1996-4082                                                                                               
               Application 08/179,238                                                                                             


               collector region of a heterojunction bipolar transistor being under an etch stop layer as defined in each          

               of independent claims 1, 7, 19, 21, 23, and 28 on appeal.                                                          







                      Representative independent claim 7 is reproduced below:                                                     

                      7.  A heterojunction bipolar transistor, comprising:                                                        

                      (a) an emitter region;                                                                                      

                      (b) a base region;                                                                                          

                      (c) an etch stop layer adjacent both said emitter region and said base region; and                          

                      (d) a collector region under said etch stop layer.                                                          

                      The following references are relied on by the examiner:                                                     

               Adlerstein                            4,939,562                      July    3, 1990                               
               Lunardi et al. (Lunardi)      5,001,534                      Mar. 19, 1991                                         
                                                                            (filed July 11, 1989)                                 

                      The 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, rejection of claims 7 to 12, 18, 24, 29, and 30 which                

               was newly made by the examiner in the Answer (see Answer, pages 5 to 6), has been withdrawn.4                      



                      4The Supplemental Answer, at page 1 therein, indicates that the amendment submitted by appellant April 8,   
               1996, has been entered and overcomes the § 112, second paragraph, rejection which was made for the first time in the
               Answer.                                                                                                            
                                                                3                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007