THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JUN HAGINAKA, HIROO WADA,
HIROYA FUJIMA and TOSHINOBU MIWA
__________
Appeal No. 96-4150
Application 08/201,7401
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection
of claims 6-9, 11 and 12. Claim 10, the only other claim remaining in the application, has
been objected to and is not before us for consideration. We reverse.
1Application for patent filed February 25, 1994. According to appellants, the application is a division
of Application 07/795,862 filed November 18, 1991, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007