THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PHILLIP SPRANGLE, RAHMAN HAFIZI,
GLENN JOYCE and PHILIP SERAFIM
____________
Appeal No. 97-0128
Application No. 08/098,9891
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 6-8, and 10-15. An amendment after final rejection
was filed March 1, 1995 and was entered by the Examiner. As a
1Application for patent filed July 29, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007