Appeal No. 1997-0189
Application No. 07/983,118
support of the rejections and arguments in rebuttal set forth
in the Examiner’s Answer.
It is our view, after consideration of the record before
us, that claims 34-43, 50, and 51 particularly point out the
invention in a manner which complies with 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph. We are also of the view that the evidence
relied upon and the level of skill in the particular art would
not have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art the
obviousness of
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007