Ex parte GANS et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1997-0262                                                        
          Application 08/286,795                                                      



          appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based on Sakakida will not                  
          be sustained.                                                               


                    As for the examiner’s rejection of independent claim              
          8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based on Sakakida, we note that                  
          claim 8 sets forth releasable attachment means connecting the               
          tether                                                                      




          means and the cover means to permit disconnection and                       
          reconnection of the cover means and the tether means, wherein               
          said attachment means comprises detachably interconnectable                 
          male and female connectors, with                                            
                    said male connector being longitudinally                          
                    slidable in said female connector to a                            
                    position at which it forms a connection                           
                    with said female connector.                                       


                    The embodiments seen in Figures 7 and 8 of the                    
          present application appear to be representative of the subject              
          matter set forth in claim 8 on appeal, given that the male                  
          connector (78)  in Figure 7 and the male connector (88) of                  
                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007