THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEFFREY E. KOELLING and CHING-YUH TSAY
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0274
Application No. 08/266,9121
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, FLEMING, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
2
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-5,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed June 27, 1994.
2In the Examiner's answer, page 3, the Examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims 1-5 under
35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph and the rejection of claims 1-5 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being
unpatentable over Kumanoya in view of the arguments presented in the Brief.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007