THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HERBERT D. STROUD, JR. and PAUL R. CADMUS
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0312
Application 08/371,3111
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 and 4-14, all the claims
remaining in the present application. Claim 1 is illustrative:
1Application for patent filed January 11, 1995. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of application 08/118,705, filed September 9, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007