Ex parte ROBLES et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-0350                                                        
          Application No. 08/191,384                                                  


               1.  A method of cleaning unwanted film deposition from a               
          throttle valve mounted on a vacuum chamber for regulating gas               
          pressure in said chamber, comprising the steps of:                          
                    positioning said throttle valve juxtaposed to said                
          vacuum chamber; and                                                         
                    flowing at least one cleaning gas into said vacuum                
          chamber at a temperature and pressure in contact with said                  
          throttle valve for a length of time such that said unwanted                 
          film deposition is removed from said throttle valve.                        
               The examiner relies upon the following reference as                    
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Law et al. (Law)            4,960,488                Oct. 2, 1990           
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a method of               
          cleaning a throttle valve employed in a vacuum deposition                   
          system.  The method entails positioning the throttle valve in               
          juxtaposition to the vacuum chamber rather than downstream                  
          from the shut-off valve.  According to appellants, the claimed              
          arrangement eliminates the need of completely disassembling                 
          and manually cleaning the throttle valve after approximately                
          500 to 1,000 deposition cycles (see pages 4 and 5 of the                    
          present specification).                                                     
               Appealed claims 1-16, 20 and 22-32 stand rejected under                
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Law.                             



                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007