Ex parte MCCABE et al. - Page 2




                  Appeal No. 97-0480                                                                                                                            
                  Application No. 07/858,818                                                                                                                    


                                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                            

                            This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to allow                                         

                  claims 10, 13, 14 and 16 as amended subsequent to the final rejection, which are all of the claims                                            

                  pending in this application.   Claim 10 is illustrative:2                                                                                                           

                                     10.  A method of delivering genes into the cells of a plant comprising the steps                                           
                            of:                                                                                                                                 
                                     preparing copies of an expression vector appropriate for the plant including an                                            
                            exogenous coding region and flanking regulatory sequences effective to express the                                                  
                            coding region in the cells of the plant;                                                                                            
                                     coating the copies of the expression vector onto biologically inert carrier                                                
                            particles;                                                                                                                          
                                     applying the coated carrier particles in a layer on a biologically inert carrier                                           
                            sheet;                                                                                                                              
                                     placing the carrier sheet above a pair of spaced electrodes which have a gap                                               
                            between them bridged by a water droplet;                                                                                            
                                     mounting a retaining screen spaced above the carrier sheet for retaining the                                               
                            carrier sheet after a selected upward distance of travel;                                                                           
                                     placing on a target surface above the retaining screen cells of the plant; and                                             
                                     applying an electric voltage between the electrodes sufficient to generate an                                              
                            electric discharge between the electrodes vaporizing the water droplet, the shock wave                                              
                            from which accelerates the carrier sheet toward the retaining screen which retains the                                              
                            carrier sheet permitting the carrier particles to continue on to penetrate the cells of the                                         
                            plant, the force of the penetration being controlled by the voltage of the electric                                                 
                            discharge.                                                                                                                          

                            The examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of obviousness:                                                       



                            2Claims 15, 26 and 27 were cancelled and claim 10 was amended by the Amendment filed April 10, 1995                                 
                  (Paper no. 16) which was approved by the examiner in the Advisory Action mailed May 05, 1995 (Paper no. 18).                                  
                  Claim 17 was cancelled and claims 10 and 16 were further amended by the Amendment filed September 07, 1995                                    
                  (Paper no. 22) which was approved by the examiner in the Advisory Action mailed November 15, 1995 (Paper no. 24).                             
                                                                               2                                                                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007