Appeal No. 97-0655
Application 08/294,913
rejection of claim 1 based on Jamison.
In summary, we have not sustained any of the
examiner’s obviousness rejections of the claims based on
Pease, Heaton and Greenwaldt. However, we have sustained the
rejection of claim 1 based on Jamison. Therefore, the
decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-17 is affirmed-in-
part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR. )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-14-
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007