Appeal No. 1997-0900
Application 08/371,039
earlier for reversing the rejection of claim 12 on appeal, the
bypassing feature of claim 9 is not taught or suggested among
the collective teachings of the references relied upon. The
feature of dependent claim 10 of conditioning a nonlinear
element to provide a linear transfer function in response to a
compression mode of a video signal prediction means is not
taught or suggested by either reference relied upon by the
examiner.
In view of the foregoing, inasmuch as we have sustained
only the rejection of claims 5, 7, and 11 within the rejection
of claims 1-3 and 5-12 of the claims on appeal, the decision
of the examiner rejecting these claims is affirmed-in-part.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007