THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS G. CANNON and DANIEL L. DE HART
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1012
Application No. 08/115,9371
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 8,
10, 11, 13, 14, 18, 20-22, 24, 28 and 30, which are all of the claims pending in this
application.
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed September 1, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007