Ex parte HOLLOWAY - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1997-1034                                                                                       
              Application No. 08/279,135                                                                                 


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                            

                     The appellant's invention relates to a memory circuit having varied levels of doping                
              between the pass gate transistors and the pull-down/up transistors.  An understanding of                   
              the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced                      
              below.                                                                                                     
                     1.     A memory circuit, comprising:                                                                
                            a flip-flop circuit for storing data having first and second pull down                       
                     transistors, a gate of each of said pull down transistors having a first predetermined              
                     conductivity level; and                                                                             
                            first and second pass gate transistors coupled to said flip-flop, a gate of                  
                     each of said pass gate transistors having a second predetermined conductivity                       
                     level less than said first predetermined level wherein data is read from and written                
                     to said flip-flop through said pass gate transistors.                                               
                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the                     
              appealed claims are:                                                                                       
                     Klein et al (Klein)                3,673,471                    Jun. 27, 1972                       
                     Harari                      4,132,904                    Jan. 02, 1979                              
                     Ichinose et al. (Ichinose)         5,020,029                    May 28, 1991                        
                     Miyaji                             5,070,482                    Dec. 03, 1991                       
                     Claims 1, 3 and 5  stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                       
              over Miyaji and Klein.  Claims 1-6, 15-17, 19 and 20  stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                       
              § 103 as being unpatentable over Ichinose and Klein.  Claim 4 stands rejected under                        




                                                           2                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007