Ex parte MOREIRA et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1997-1081                                                                                     Page 2                        
                 Application No. 08/111,922                                                                                                             


                                                                   BACKGROUND                                                                           
                          The appellants' invention relates to a shearable riser                                                                        
                 joint.  A substantially correct copy of claims 6 through 8                                                                             
                 appears in the appendix to the appellants' brief.2                                                                                     


                          No prior art references are relied upon by the examiner                                                                       
                 in rejecting the appealed claims.3                                                                                                     


                          Claims 6 through 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                                                                      
                 first and second paragraphs, as the claimed invention is not                                                                           
                 described in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to                                                                           
                 enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same,                                                                         
                 and/or for failing to particularly point out and distinctly                                                                            
                 claim the subject matter which the appellants regard as the                                                                            
                 invention.                                                                                                                             



                          2Claim 8 contains a minor error in that claim 8 depends                                                                       
                 from claim 7, not claim 6.                                                                                                             
                          3The filewrapper of this application fails to reveal that                                                                     
                 the examiner searched this application.  Upon return of this                                                                           
                 application to the examiner, the examiner should ensure that                                                                           
                 the required search be performed and recorded in the                                                                                   
                 filewrapper of this application.                                                                                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007