THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KENNETH C. CURT, EDWARD J. CHEJLAVA JR.,
and ANTHONY KOZACZUK
____________
Appeal No. 97-1213
Application No. 08/459,5611
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, KRASS, and SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 51 and 52. Claim 53 has been allowed by the examiner.
1Application for patent filed June 2, 1995. According to
appellants, this application is a divisional of Application
08/356,926, filed December 14, 1994, now abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application 07/964,590, filed October 20,
1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007