THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JAMES TESKEY
_____________
Appeal No. 97-1366
Application No. 08/281,3181
______________
HEARD: August 4, 1999
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge and
PATE and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 2 and 4 through 10. These claims
Application for patent filed July 28, 1994. According to appellant,1
this application is a continuation of application no. 08/023,836, filed
February 23, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007