THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
_______________
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte SHINSAKU TSURUMOTO,
HARUNOBU TATENO, MINEO GAMO,
SADAO KAKIZAWA, and KATSUJI KOBAYASHI
Appeal No. 1997-1379
Application 08/194,7481
ON BRIEF
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
Application for patent filed February 10, 1994,1
entitled "Automatic Product Conveying System," which is a
division of Application 08/023,856, filed February 24, 1993,
now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application
07/776,227, filed November 13, 1991, now abandoned, which
claims the filing benefit of PCT Application PCT/JP91/00287,
filed March 4, 1991, and Japanese Application 02-62708, filed
March 15, 1990.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007