Ex parte TAKAI et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-1426                                                          
          Application 08/380,125                                                      



                    The full text of the examiner's rejections and                    
          response to the argument presented by appellants appears in                 
          the answer                                                                  
          (Paper No. 10), while the complete statement of appellants’                 
          argument can be found in the brief (Paper No. 9).                           




                                       OPINION                                        
                    In reaching our conclusion on the issues raised in                
          this appeal, this panel of the board has carefully considered               
          appellants’ specification and claims, the applied teachings,                
          and the respective viewpoints of appellants and the examiner.               
          As a consequence of our review, we make the determinations                  
          which follow.                                                               
                              The indefiniteness issue                                
                    We reverse the rejection of claim 4 under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite.                               
                    The sole concern of the examiner, as explained in                 
          the answer (page 3), is that the language “the other roll                   
          stand” on line 10 of claim 4 lacks clear antecedent basis and               

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007