THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WALDA B. LIPSON and CARL YURDIN
_____________
Appeal No. 97-1438
Application 08/339,1421
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT and STAAB, Administrative Patent
Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1, 3, 5, and 10 through 24.
Claims 6 through 9, the only other claims remaining in the
application, stand objected to by the examiner. However,
1 Application for patent filed November 14, 1994. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/902,964, filed June 23, 1992,
now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 08/098,687, filed July 28,
1992, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 08/200,858, filed
February 22, 1994, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007