Ex parte MCCLINTON - Page 14




          Appeal No. 97-1445                                         Page 14           
          Application No. 08/202,254                                                   


               To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject                    
          claims 7, 16, 18 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                    
          anticipated by Kaplan, claims 8 through 10, 12 and 20 through                
          28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kaplan and               
          claim 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                    
          Kaplan in view of Gillet is affirmed.  The decision of the                   
          examiner to reject claims 46 through 56 under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as being unpatentable over Kaplan in view of Rinninger,                      
          however, is reversed.                                                        




























Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007