Ex parte ALECCI et al. - Page 16




          Appeal No. 1997-1654                                      Page 16           
          Application No.  08/431,307                                                 


               However, as is particularly evident in Lam, a                          
               modified collection of shared code segments, which                     
               impart "attributes" to a NewWave object instance,                      
               is, specified when the object is created and                           
               executed. Similarly, the "code" which serves as a                      
               "source" for defining a Rosenthal widget is                            
               necessarily modified when a subordinate instance of                    
               the widget is formed, using "overriding attributes".                   
               (Examiner’s Answer at 5.)                                              
          We agree with the examiner.                                                 


               Claims 29 and 39 each merely specifies that “said step of              
          assigning a predetermined value to each of the overriding                   
          attributes comprises modifying a source code corresponding to               
          the program.”  Rosenthal teaches a “Hello, World” computer                  
          program.  P. 71.  Insertion of lines of code specifying                     
          overriding attributes, i.e., the “Hello, World” string, into                
          the program modifies the original program.  This insertion                  
          would have suggested that “said step of assigning a                         
          predetermined value to each of the overriding attributes                    
          comprises modifying a source code corresponding to the                      
          program.”  Therefore, we affirm the rejections of claims 29                 
          and 39.  Next, we address the obviousness of claims 30, 40,                 
          and 48.                                                                     









Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007